![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
McLuhan missed only one letter when he stated that new technologies would transform society into a global village. Not
one global village rised from the use of networking technologies but an uncountable number of global villages, with different size, goal or scope of interest. Personal, professional
and societal networks are developing in more differentiated
and functionalized forms. Networking technologies empower
citizens and groups of citizens to to organize their own expertize, contra-expertize or even regulate their own environment. Self-regulation and grass-roots movements are core principles on computer networks like the Internet.
Computer networks and the global villages or virtual communu
ties that exist therein are organized by their scope of interest, goal or function. Politics and democratic processes are
traditionally based on geographic boundaries and express a
top-down vision on how to regulate societal processes. This
tension between institutional politics and democracy and the
structure and organization of computer networks already shows
when governments use a traditional top down-vision to try to
regulate the Internet on subjects as encryption, intellectual
property or (child-)pornography. For the present it will probably show that traditional concepts on democracy and government regulation won't work on computer networks. For the future, when the use of computer networks rises tremendously,
the questions will be more whether or not (and how) the tradi
tional politics and democracy will be able to transform them-
selves into the informational age. Or will they slowly become
obsolete and perish?
Amsterdam, 18 - 22 january 1996
have a look at the World Exposition Internet 1996
http://park.org/