The Tactics of Appropriation
From its earliest articulations, tactical media practitioners have always
recognised "appropriation" as one of the prime constitutive elements of the
tactical.
From the re-purposing of the fruits of the consumer electronics
industry,(exploiting video's forensic immediacy to institute a subject
centred realism) through to later phases of new media tactics, as evinced by
the work of groups like RTMark, and the practices of logo tinkering, and
imposturing, blossoming on the Net.
Thus rather than complaining about the
speed with which our tactics are stolen it is time to recognise that
tactical media has been in the appropriation game all along.
Indeed it is in the precise moment of appropriation that power becomes
momentarily visible. And here lies the opportunity for the balance of power
to be re-defined, for the weak once again to turn the tables on the strong.
Appropriation is the name of the game. The important question is who
appropriates whom?
There are some who would rather seek solace in the belief that a new social
movement is emerging from the formation of alliances between a multitude of
heterogeneous critical groups and micro-movements.
But those who believe
that mass movements are immune from appropriation should observer the ease
with which Chirac together with a coalition of EU member states have
appropriated the mass peace demonstrations to legitimise their geo-political
stance visa a vie America.
The scope and logic of appropriation are
infinite. Here as elsewhere power exists both where it is enacted and where
it is being challenged
If appropriation is indeed one of the crucial operators of media politics,
the question how that condition can be effectively addressed (rather than
escaped from), is especially important.
So we can ask questions like: in
what ways are opposition politics these days constrained by logics of
appropriation? and how can we conceive of appropriation as something that
enables instead of threatens antagonistic politics?